Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tyco (Australia) Pty Ltd T/AS ADT Security v Signature Security Group Pty Ltd (No 7) [2011] FCA 615 Citation: Tyco (Australia) Pty Ltd T/AS ADT Security v Signature Security Group Pty Ltd (No 7) [2011] FCA 615
Parties: TYCO (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD TRADING AS ADT SECURITY v SIGNATURE SECURITY GROUP PTY LIMITED, SIMECORP PTY LTD , MARTIN SALAZAR, AUSTRALIAN SECURITY AND FIRE PTY LTD, GREGORY THOMAS, SECURITY SELECT PTY LTD and MICHAEL CALIFANO
File number: NSD 779 of 2009
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 30 May 2011
Catchwords: JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – Default judgment – application for default judgment against respondents who failed to appear at trial – principles relevant to application for default judgment – Federal Court Rules O 35A
Legislation: Federal Court Rules O 35A rr 2, 3
Cases cited: Australian Communications and Media Authority v Mobilegate Ltd A company incorporated in Hong Kong (No.2) [2009] FCA 887 cited Arthur v Vaupotic Investments Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 433 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v 1Cellnet LLC [2005] FCA 856 cited Luna Park Sydney Pty Ltd v Bose [2006] FCA 94 cited Turner; in the Matter of LA Technologies Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) [2009] FCA 805 cited Wu v Avin Operations Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 36 cited
Date of hearing: 30 May 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate