Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Carson v Dynasty Metals Australia Ltd [2011] FCA 621 Citation: Carson v Dynasty Metals Australia Ltd [2011] FCA 621
Parties: MALCOLM ANTHONY CARSON v DYNASTY METALS AUSTRALIA LTD ACN 110 385 709, NICHOLAS GERARD REVELL, IAN LEVY and GRAHAM DOUGLAS ANDERSON
File number(s): NSD 772 of 2011
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 31 May 2011
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application for interlocutory injunction – whether proxy appointment ineffective by virtue of s 250B of the Corporations Act if sent to third party and forwarded to company
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 250A, 250B, 1322(4)
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 Bisan Ltd v Cellante (2002) 173 FLR 310; [2002] VSC 430 Portman Iron Ore Limited, in the matter of Golden West Resources Limited (2008) 170 FCR 409
Date of hearing: 31 May 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 26
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M S White with Mr B D Kaplan
Solicitor for the Applicant: Peter M Wayne & Associates
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr J C Giles
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Bennett + Co Solicitors
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: The respondent did not appear
Solicitor for the Third Respondent: The respondent did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 772 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate