Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jones v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2011] FCA 632 Citation: Jones v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2011] FCA 632
Parties: MILTON STANLEY KNIGHT JONES v CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY and HIS HONOUR MAGISTRATE DUNCAN REYNOLDS
File number: VID 155 of 2011
Judge: MARSHALL J
Date of judgment: 6 June 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of whether there was a proper basis for the issue of a warrant to seize material by a magistrate – s 32AF of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (Cth) – meaning of "suspicion"
Words & Phrases "suspicion"
Legislation: Civil Aviation Act 1988 (Cth) s 32AF Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B
Cases cited: George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104 Queensland Bacon Pty Ltd v Rees (1966) 115 CLR 266
Date of hearing: 27 May 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 29
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr J Ribbands
Solicitor for the Applicant: Maitland Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr N Harrington
Solicitor for the Respondents: Casa Legal Branch
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 155 of 2011
BETWEEN: MILTON STANLEY KNIGHT JONES
Applicant
AND: CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
First Respondent
HIS HONOUR MAGISTRATE DUNCAN REYNOLDS
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MARSHALL J DATE OF ORDER: 6 JUNE 2011 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate