Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Crowe-Maxwell, in the matter of Minc Financial Services Holdings Pty Limited (Administrators Appointed) [2011] FCA 637 Citation: Crowe-Maxwell, in the matter of Minc Financial Services Holdings Pty Limited (Administrators Appointed) [2011] FCA 637
Parties: ATLE CROWE-MAXWELL AND KEN WHITTINGHAM IN THEIR CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATORS OF MINC FINANCIAL SERVICES HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) ACN 126 999 308
File number(s): NSD 775 of 2011
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 30 May 2011
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application for declarations pursuant to s 1322(4)(a) of Corporations Act – where notice of second meeting of creditors omitted name of companies – where proxy forms circulated to creditors omitted certain resolutions
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 439A, 447A, 1322 Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth)
Date of hearing: 30 May 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Mr M Kelly of Blake Dawson
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 775 of 2011
BETWEEN: ATLE CROWE-MAXWELL AND KEN WHITTINGHAM IN THEIR CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATORS OF MINC FINANCIAL SERVICES HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) ACN 126 999 308
Plaintiff
JUDGE: JAGOT J DATE OF ORDER: 30 MAY 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. In respect of Minc Financial Services Pty Limited (MFS) and Australian Stockbroking and Advisory Services Pty Limited (ASANDAS), pursuant to s 1322(4)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Act), the Proxy Forms accompanying the notices of the meetings of those Companies given to creditors on 24 May 2011 pursuant to s 439A(3)(a) and the Proxy Forms circulated to creditors on 27 May 2011 are not invalid by reason of any contravention of regs 5.6.29(1)(a) or 5.6.31 of the Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth) (the Regulations). 2. With respect to MFS, ASANDAS and Minc Financial Services Holdings Pty Limited (each a Company and together the Companies): (a) pursuant to s 1322(4)(a) of the Act, the meeting of creditors of the Company convened under s 439A(3) to be held on 1 June 2011 is not invalid by reason of any contravention of s 439A(3)(b) of the Act, which requires notice of the meeting to be published at least five days before the meeting; and (b) pursuant to s 447A(1) of the Act, Pt 5.3A of the Act is to operate in relation to the Company as though s 439A(3)(b) required that the meeting of the Company's creditors be convened by causing notice of the meeting to be published in a national newspaper or, in each State or Territory in which the Company has its registered office or carries on business, in a daily newspaper that circulates generally in that State or Territory, at least 4 business days before the meeting. 3. The plaintiffs' costs and expenses of this application be costs and expenses of the administration of the Companies. 4. These orders may be entered forthwith. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate