Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Siemens Water Technologies Corp v GE Betz Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 641 Citation: Siemens Water Technologies Corp v GE Betz Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 641
Parties: SIEMENS WATER TECHNOLOGIES CORP and MEMCOR AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 003 581 566 v GE BETZ PTY LTD ACN 001 221 941, ZENON AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 111 935 114 and GE BETZDEARBORN CANADA COMPANY
File number(s): NSD 601 of 2010
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 2 June 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for discovery – whether disputed categories of documents relevant to issues between parties – whether applicants should be required to put forward competing interpretation of claims of patent before discovery ordered – whether compliance with discovery obligation would be unduly onerous
Legislation: Patents Act 1990 (Cth)
Date of hearing: 2 June 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the First and Second Applicants: Ms C Cochrane
Solicitor for the First and Second Applicants: Shelston IP Lawyers
Counsel for the First, Second and Third Respondents: Mr C Dimitriadis
Solicitor for the First, Second and Third Respondents: Corrs Chambers Westgarth
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 601 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate