Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Super City Home Loans Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 646 Citation: Singh v Super City Home Loans Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 646
Parties: BALBIR SINGH and PREM JEET KAUR SINGH v SUPER CITY HOME LOANS PTY LTD (ACN 106 474 837), DEBDATTA PAHARI, HELEN PAHARI, BLEIER MORTGAGE CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 060 520 854), DAVID BLEIER, ROBERT LOUIS KREMNIZER, SHLOOMP PTY LTD (ACN 000 811 834), BACCUS INVESTMENTS LIMITED (ACN 095 832 072), CHRIS HICKEY and LAWTEAL SECONDS PTY LTD (ACN 113 351 474)
File number: NSD 1601 of 2010
Judge: FOSTER J
Date of judgment: 8 June 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether certain individuals and organisations should be added as respondents to this proceeding – whether the whole proceeding should be dismissed pursuant to s 31A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether the pleadings should be struck out in whole or in part pursuant to O 11 r 16 of the Federal Court Rules
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 58, 60 and 116 Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A Legal Aid Commission Act 1979 (NSW) s 27(1), s 33 Legal Profession Act 2007 (NSW), s 730 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 52 Consumer Credit (New South Wales) Code Federal Court Rules O 6 rr 2, 3, 6 and 8, O 11 r 16, O 20 r 5
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate