Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mercedes Holdings Pty Limited v Waters (No 4) [2011] FCA 666 Citation: Mercedes Holdings Pty Limited v Waters (No 4) [2011] FCA 666
Parties: MERCEDES HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED, MAX INVESTMENTS (AUST) PTY LIMITED, MANSTED ENTERPRISES PTY LTD, MICHELLE O'GARR, JM CUSTOMS & FREIGHT SERVICES PTY LIMITED, OSVON PTY LIMITED, ADAM JOHN THORN & GRAHAM DEAN and MARK ROBERT HODGES & JANET ANNE HODGES v ANDREA JANE WATERS, MICHAEL JOHN ANDREW, WELLINGTON INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED, OCTAVIA LIMITED, GUY HUTCHINGS, JOHN ARTHUR WHATELEY, JACK SIMON DIAMOND, CRAIG ROBERT WHITE, DEBORAH BEALE, STEVEN KRIS KYLING, STUART ROBERTSON PRICE, MICHAEL GORDON HISCOCK, MICHAEL CHRISTODOULOU KING, PAUL JOSEPH MANKA and IAN ZELINSKI
File number: NSD 324 of 2009
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 8 June 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Subpoena – application to set aside subpoena
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 55 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A
Cases cited: Bailey v Beagle Management Pty Ltd (2001) 105 FCR 136 cited Imobilari Pty Ltd v Opes Prime Stockbroking Ltd (in liq) (2008) 252 ALR 41 cited Pharm-A-Care Laboratories Pty Ltd v Commonwealth [2009] FCA 1203 cited Spender Motors Pty Ltd v LNC Industries Ltd [1982] 2 NSWLR 921 cited
Date of hearing: 7 June 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate