Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Henley Arch Pty Ltd v McDonald Jones Homes Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 687 Citation: Henley Arch Pty Ltd v McDonald Jones Homes Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 687
Parties: HENLEY ARCH PTY LTD (ACN 007 316 930) and HENLEY PROPERTIES (QLD) PTY LTD (ACN 007 316 930) v MCDONALD JONES HOMES PTY LTD (ACN 089 524 050), NEWCASTLE QUALITY CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD (ACN 003 687 232), STUART EVERITT DESIGN STUDIO PTY LTD (ACN 114 049 106) and STUART EVERITT
File number: VID 821 of 2010
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 21 June 2011
Catchwords: DISCOVERY – application for pre-action discovery
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ss 10, 14 31, 32, 36, 115 Federal Court Rules O 15A r 6
Cases cited: Barrett Property Group Pty Ltd v Metricon Homes Pty Ltd (2007) 74 IPR 52 cited Dartberg Pty Ltd v Wealthcare Financial Planning Pty Ltd (2007) 164 FCR 450 cited Echo Tasmania Pty Ltd v Imperial Chemical Industries PLC [2008] FCAFC 58 cited Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading Pty Ltd (2008) 169 FCR 435 cited St George Bank Ltd v Rabo Australia Ltd (2004) 211 ALR 147 applied
Date of hearing: 26 November 2010 and 1 April 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 43
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr R Cobden SC and Mr T Cordiner
Solicitor for the Applicants: Blake Dawson
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr P Collinson SC
Solicitor for the Respondents: Thomas Mitchell Solicitors
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate