Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Goodricke v Comcare [2011] FCA 694 Citation: Goodricke v Comcare [2011] FCA 694
Appeal from: Re Goodricke and Comcare [2010] AATA 410
Parties: PETER GOODRICKE v COMCARE
File number: ACD 27 of 2010
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 20 June 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal – failure to identify question of law – unrepresented party – ability to reframe questions – appeal dismissed ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – reasonable opportunity to present case
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 33(1)(b), 39, 44 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A(2) Federal Court Rules O 53 r 3(2)(b) Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) ss 4, 8, 19
Cases cited: Birdseye v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2003] FCAFC 232, 76 ALD 321, referred to Brown v Repatriation Commission (1985) 7 FCR 302, considered Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 46 FLR 409, cited Goodricke and Comcare, Re [2010] AATA 410, considered Ibarcena v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services [2001] FCA 453, 33 AAR 76, referred to Kowalski v Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission [2010] FCAFC 10, 114 ALD 8, cited Minogue v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1999) 84 FCR 438, referred to Naisauvou v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 86, 89 FCR 435, considered Opitz v Repatriation Commission (1991) 29 FCR 50, referred to Rana v Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission [2011] FCAFC 80, referred to Robinson, Re [1955] NZLR 106, cited Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations v Ergin [2010] FCA 1438, referred to Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services v Verney [2000] FCA 570, 60 ALD 737, referred to Sullivan v Department of Transport (1978) 20 ALR 323, referred to Woodley v Woodley and Meldrum [1928] NZLR 465, cited Benjamin, Commissioner Robert M, 'Administrative Adjudication in the State of New York: Report to the Honourable Herbert H. Lehman', 1942.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate