Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pharm-a-Care Laboratories Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (No 7) [2011] FCA 715 Citation: Pharm-a-Care Laboratories Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (No 7) [2011] FCA 715
Parties: PHARM-A-CARE LABORATORIES PTY LTD (ACN 003 468 219) v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA AND ORS
File number: NSD 1991 of 2008
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 22 June 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – representative proceeding – application to vary orders made – extension of time to make claim – variation of order to reduce costs payable – variation to increase amount payable – mistake on part of legal representative
Legislation: Federal Court Rules O 35 r 7
Cases cited: Akedian Co Ltd v Royal Insurance Australia Ltd [1999] 1 VR 80, referred to Austal Ships Sales Pty Ltd v Aktiebolag [2009] FCAFC 179, 263 ALR 384, considered Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd [2004] FCA 685, considered Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Yandal Gold [2003] FCA 77, considered Bailey v Marinoff (1971) 125 CLR 529, cited BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2001] FCA 336, cited Brookfield v Davey Products Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 889, cited Burrell v R [2008] HCA 34, referred to Caboolture Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd (In liq) v White Industries (Qld) Pty Ltd (1993) 45 FCR 224, considered Chessum and Sons v Gordon [1901] 1 QB 694, referred to Citrus Queensland Pty Ltd v Sunstate Orchards Pty Ltd (No 10) [2009] FCA 498, cited Craigmyle v Inchcape [1942] Ch 394, considered Denmeade v Stingray Boats [2004] FCA 1503, referred to Dib Group Pty Ltd v Coolabah Tree Aust-Wide Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 57, referred to Elyard Corporation Pty Ltd v DDB Needham Sydney Pty Ltd (1995) 61 FCR 385, considered Goliath Portland Cement Co Ltd v Chief Executive Officer of Customs [2000] FCA 1329, referred to Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215, considered Hanave Pty Ltd v LFOT Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 180, 136 FCR 566, considered J W Challand Pty Limited, Re (1945) 62 WN (NSW) 166, cited L Shaddock & Associates Proprietary Limited v Council of the City of Parramatta (No 2) (1982) 151 CLR 590, considered MZXSV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 1025, cited NSW Insurance Ministerial Corporation v Edkins (1998) 45 NSWLR 8, cited Owston Nominees No 2 Pty Ltd v Branir Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 629, 129 FCR 558., considered Pharm-a-Care Laboratories Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (No 6) [2011] FCA 277, cited SZCZF v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 208, cited SZMLB v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) [2008] FCA 1962, cited UTSA Pty Ltd v Ultra Tune Australia Pty Ltd [1998] VSC 13, [1999] 1 VR 204, considered
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate