Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ACP Machinery Australia Pty Ltd v Aerospace Technologies of Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 727 Citation: ACP Machinery Australia Pty Ltd v Aerospace Technologies of Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 727
Parties: ACP MACHINERY AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 066 485 925) v AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGIES OF AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 008 622 008) and BOEING AEROSTRUCTURES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 103 165 466)
File number: VID 765 of 2010
Judge: DODDS-STREETON J
Date of judgment: 22 June 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Pleadings – Statement of claim – Application to further amend – Whether applicant should be granted leave to amend – Whether applicant should pay respondents' costs
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 13 r 2(1)
Cases cited: Medich v Bentley Smith Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 494 cited
Date of hearing: 22 June 2011
Date of publication of reasons: 28 June 2011
Date of last submissions: 22 June 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 46
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr A Ryan SC with M C Smith
Solicitor for the Applicant: Griffith Hack
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr C Golvan SC
Solicitor for the Respondents: Middletons
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 765 of 2010
BETWEEN: ACP MACHINERY AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 066 485 925)
Applicant
AND: AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGIES OF AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 008 622 008)
First Respondent
BOEING AEROSTRUCTURES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 103 165 466)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate