Mircevski v Pattison [2011] FCA 740

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Mircevski v Pattison [2011] FCA 740 Citation: Mircevski v Pattison [2011] FCA 740

Parties: ALEX MIRCEVSKI v PAUL ANTHONY PATTISON and PATTISON BUSINESS RECOVERY & INSOLVENCY SPECIALISTS PTY LTD (ACN 098 345 343) and INSOLVENCY AND TRUSTEE SERVICE AUSTRALIA and DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OR TAXATION

File number: VID 193 of 2011

Judge: MARSHALL J

Date of judgment: 25 May 2011

Date of hearing: 25 May 2011

Place: Melbourne

Division: GENERAL DIVISION

Number of paragraphs: 3

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr G Slater

Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr P Fary

Solicitor for the First Respondent: Meltzer Green Lawyers

Counsel for the Third Respondent: Ms C Gobbo

Solicitor for the Third Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor

Counsel for the Fourth Respondent: Mr J Matheson of ATO Legal Services

Solicitor for the Fourth Respondent ATO Legal Services

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 193 of 2011

BETWEEN: ALEX MIRCEVSKI

Applicant

AND: PAUL ANTHONY PATTISON

First Respondent

PATTISON BUSINESS RECOVERY & INSOLVENCY SPECIALISTS PTY LTD (ACN 098 345 343)

Second Respondent

INSOLVENCY AND TRUSTEE SERVICE AUSTRALIA

Third Respondent

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OR TAXATION

Fourth Respondent

JUDGE: MARSHALL J DATE OF ORDER: 25 MAY 2011 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. The substantive application is dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs of the proceeding. 3. The applicant pay the third respondent's costs of the proceeding. 4. There is liberty to apply on the question of costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 193 of 2011