CMA Corporation Limited v McSorley [2011] FCA 747

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

CMA Corporation Limited v McSorley [2011] FCA 747 Citation: CMA Corporation Limited v McSorley [2011] FCA 747

Parties: CMA CORPORATION LIMITED and CMA RECYCLING PTY LTD v IAN MCSORLEY

File number: NSD 233 of 2011

Judge: ROBERTSON J

Date of judgment: 4 July 2011

Corrigendum: 7 July 2011

Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application that proceeding be continued at WA District Registry – application dismissed

Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 48

Cases cited: Blackrock Asset Management Australia Services Limited v Waked (No 2) [2011] FCA 479 cited Green v Atlantic International Entertainment Australia Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 1278 applied Lamb v Hog's Breath Co [2007] FCA 49 applied Mortimer v Opes Prime Stockbroking Limited (ACN 086 294 028) (Administrators Appointed) (In Liquidation) [2009] FCA 227 applied National Mutual Holdings Pty Ltd v The Sentry Corporation (1988) 19 FCR 155 applied

Date of hearing: 27 June 2011

Place: Sydney

Division: GENERAL DIVISION

Category: Catchwords

Number of paragraphs: 33

Counsel for the Plaintiffs: Mr J C Giles

Solicitor for the Plaintiffs: Minter Ellison

Solicitor for the Defendant: Mr H J Paiker of Paiker & Overmeire

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

CMA Corporation Ltd v McSorley [2011] FCA 747

CORRIGENDUM

1. In paragraph 15 of the Reasons for Judgment, in the first sentence, the words '"WA silver"' should read '("WA silver")'. 2. In paragraph 15 of the Reasons for Judgment, in the third sentence, the words 'denies, paragraph' should read 'denies paragraph'. 3. In paragraph 26 of the Reasons for Judgment, in the last sentence, the word 'plaintiff's' should read 'plaintiffs''. 4. In paragraph 30 of the Reasons for Judgment, in the last sentence, the words 'videolink, may' should read 'videolink may'. I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Corrigendum to the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Robertson.