Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kowalski v Dolphin (No 2) [2011] FCA 779 Citation: Kowalski v Dolphin (No 2) [2011] FCA 779
Parties: KAZIMIR KOWALSKI v STEVEN PETER DOLPHIN, LIESCHKE & WEATHERILL, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS and QBE INSURANCE (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
File number: SAD 12 of 2011
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 14 July 2011
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 9
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: The respondents did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 12 of 2011
BETWEEN: KAZIMIR KOWALSKI
Applicant
AND: STEVEN PETER DOLPHIN
First Respondent
LIESCHKE & WEATHERILL
Second Respondent
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS
Third Respondent
QBE INSURANCE (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
Fourth Respondent
JUDGE: BESANKO J DATE OF ORDER: 14 JULY 2011 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant's notice of motion dated 2 June 2011 not be accepted for filing. 2. Leave to issue the notice of motion dated 2 June 2011 be refused. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 12 of 2011
BETWEEN: KAZIMIR KOWALSKI
Applicant
AND: STEVEN PETER DOLPHIN
First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate