Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Solahart Industries Pty Ltd v Solar Shop Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 780 Citation: Solahart Industries Pty Ltd v Solar Shop Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 780
Parties: SOLAHART INDUSTRIES PTY LTD and RHEEM AUSTRALIA PTY LTD v SOLAR SHOP PTY LTD and SOLAR HUT PTY LTD
File number: NSD 717 of 2009
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 7 July 2011
Catchwords: TRADE MARKS – Remedies – application for injunctions and delivery up following trade mark infringement – whether injunctions should issue – principles relevant to delivery up
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 5(2), 23 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 126
Cases cited: Coflexip SA v Stolt Comex Seaway MS Limited [2001] RPC 9 cited Colbeam Palmer Ltd v Stock Affiliates Pty Ltd (1968) 122 CLR 25 cited Humphries v Halifax Vogel Group Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 569 cited Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Knierum [2004] FCA 1584 cited Scarel Pty Ltd & Yates v City Loan & Credit Corporation (1988) 17 FCR 344 cited Slazenger & Son v Feltham & Co [1889] 6 RPC 531 cited Solahart Industries Pty Ltd v Solar Shop Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 700 cited Vavasseur v Krupp (1878) 9 Ch D 351 cited Meagher, Heydon & Leeming, Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity Doctrines and Remedies (Butterworths, 4th ed, 2002)
Date of hearing: 6 July 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate