Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Remta v Osprey Property Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 786 Citation: Remta v Osprey Property Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 786
Parties: PETER JOHN AUGUSTIN REMTA, LAWRENE HILLARY REMTA, MARCUS AUGUSTIN DE VERNY REMTA AND JONATHAN HOWARD AUGUSTIN DE VERNY REMTA v OSPREY PROPERTY PTY LTD ACN 105 740 592
File number: WAD 140 of 2008
Judge: NORTH J
Date of judgment: 15 July 2011
Legislation: Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 51A, 52
Date of hearing: 15, 16 and 17 December 2010
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 110
Hearing 15 and 16 December 2011 The Applicant appeared in person Counsel for the Applicant:
Hearing 17 December 2011 Mr C Williams Counsel for the Applicant:
Solicitor for the Applicant: Solomon Brothers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr T Coyle
Solicitor for the Respondent: Lavan Legal
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 140 of 2008
BETWEEN: PETER JOHN AUGUSTIN REMTA, LAWRENE HILLARY REMTA, MARCUS AUGUSTIN DE VERNY REMTA AND JONATHAN HOWARD AUGUSTIN DE VERNY REMTA
Applicants
AND: OSPREY PROPERTY PTY LTD ACN 105 740 592
Respondent
JUDGE: NORTH J DATE OF ORDER: 15 JULY 2011 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT DECLARES THAT:
1. The contract of sale purportedly made by the first named applicant and the respondent on 16 August 2007 for the purchase of Unit 15 in the Waterline development at Halls Head, Mandurah, Western Australia was void ab initio.
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
2. The respondent pay the first applicant the sum of $153,000 by way of return of the deposit paid to it pursuant to the said contract.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate