Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tada Constructions Corporation Pty Ltd v JP Dixon Real Estate Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 791 Citation: Tada Constructions Corporation Pty Ltd v JP Dixon Real Estate Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 791
Parties: TADA CONSTRUCTIONS CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 099 542 784) v JP DIXON REAL ESTATE PTY LTD (ACN 005 514 992) and JONATHAN DIXON
File number: VID 309 of 2010
Judge: DODDS-STREETON J
Date of judgment: 7 July 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application to strike out further amended statement of claim – Whether adequate particulars of loss and damage – Whether trial date should be vacated
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37M, 37I
Cases cited: Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2011] FCA 388 cited Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 cited Cement Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2010) 187 FCR 261 considered Murphy & Anor v Overton Investments Pty Ltd (2004) 216 CLR 388 cited Sali v SPC Ltd & Anor (1993) 67 ALJR 515 referred to Tada Constructions Corporation Pty Ltd v JP Dixon Real Estate Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 703 referred to
Date of hearing: 7 July 2011
Date of publication of reasons: 15 July 2011
Date of last submissions: 7 July 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 60
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate