Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis [2011] FCA 796 Citation: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis [2011] FCA 796
Parties: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION v EMMANUEL GEORGE CASSIMATIS and JULIE GLADYS CASSIMATIS
File number: QUD 574 of 2010
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 18 July 2011
Catchwords: COSTS – application for an order for interlocutory costs to be taxed and paid forthwith – consideration of the principles governing the application of O 62 r 3(3) of the Federal Court Rules – ordinarily costs to be taxed and paid at the conclusion of the proceedings – consideration of the courts discretion to depart from that general principle – costs incurred by numerous amendments of ill-considered pleadings supports the variation of the general principle under O 62 r 3(3) Held: respondents may tax and collect their costs forthwith
Legislation: Federal Court Rules O 62 r 3(3) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 180
Cases cited: Bailey v Beagle Management Pty Ltd (2001) 105 FCR 136; [2001] FCA 60 Spotwire Pty Ltd v Visa International Service Association (No 2) [2004] FCA 571 All Services Australia Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2000) 171 ALR 330; [2000] FCA 375 Airservices Australia Pty Ltd v Jeppesen Sanderson Inc [2006] FCA 906
Date of hearing: 15 June 2011
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate