Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tatow on behalf of the Iman People #2 v State of Queensland [2011] FCA 802 Citation: Tatow on behalf of the Iman People #2 v State of Queensland [2011] FCA 802
Parties: RUSSELL TATOW & ORS ON BEHALF OF THE IMAN PEOPLE #2 v STATE OF QUEENSLAND & ORS
File number: QUD 6162 of 1998
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 19 July 2011
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – s 66B Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – O 14 r 7(1) and O 1 r 8 Federal Court Rules – whether leave should be granted for affidavits to be filed in Court – whether existing Native Title applicant no longer authorised to make application – whether the applicants to notice of motion authorised by claim group to make application – whether authorisation meeting resolved to replace the Native Title applicant – whether authorisation meeting was properly convened and conducted – whether information concerning authorisation meeting properly disclosed
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) s 66B Federal Court Rules O 1 r 8, O 14 r 7(1)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate