Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Cranswick [2011] FCA 814 Citation: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Cranswick [2011] FCA 814
Parties: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v ANDREW NOEL CRANSWICK
File number: WAD 223 of 2009
Judge: MARSHALL J
Date of judgment: 21 July 2011
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – legal professional privilege – privilege claimed over documents produced in response to subpoenas – waiver of privilege
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)
Cases cited: Kennedy v Wallace (2004) 142 FCR 185 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cadbury Schweppes (2009) 174 FCR 547 Schreuder v Murray (No 2) [2009] WASCA 145 Cook v Pasminco Ltd (No 2) (2000) 107 FCR 44 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Cranswick [2010] FCA 891 Telstra v BT Australia (1998) 85 FCR 152 Goldberg v Ng (1995) 185 CLR 83
Date of hearing: 23 June 2011
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 43
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P Hannan
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr A Young
Solicitor for the Respondent: Middletons
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 223 of 2009
BETWEEN: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Applicant
AND: ANDREW NOEL CRANSWICK
Respondent
JUDGE: MARSHALL J DATE OF ORDER: 21 JULY 2011 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE (HEARD IN PERTH)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate