Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Andelman v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2011] FCA 815 Citation: Andelman v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2011] FCA 815
Appeal from: Application for extension of time: Andelman v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2011] FCA 299
Parties: MIKHAIL ANDELMAN v ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILIES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY SERVICES & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
File number: NSD 608 of 2011
Judge: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 4 July 2011
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth)
Cases cited: Jess v Scott (1986) 12 FCR 187
Date of hearing: 4 July 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 20
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person with the assistance of an interpreter
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Mr A Markus of Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 608 of 2011
BETWEEN: MIKHAIL ANDELMAN
Applicant
AND: ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
First Respondent
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILIES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY SERVICES & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
Second Respondent
JUDGE: NICHOLAS J DATE OF ORDER: 4 July 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services & Indigenous Affairs be joined as the second respondent. 2. The service of any amended application is dispensed with. 3. The application is dismissed. 4. The applicant is to pay the second respondent's costs of this application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate