Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jackson v Minister for Justice [2011] FCA 831 Citation: Jackson v Minister for Justice [2011] FCA 831
Parties: PETER F JACKSON v MINISTER FOR JUSTICE
File number: QUD 536 of 2010
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 26 July 2011
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application pursuant to s 5(1) Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) for order of review – applicant currently serving prison sentence following conviction related to importation of cocaine – federal offence pursuant to s 233B(1) Customs Act 1901 (Cth) – decision of Minister to refuse application to grant licence for early release from prison pursuant to s19AP Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) – Minister found exceptional circumstances existed justifying grant of licence – no dispute that decision was made despite some ambiguity in reasons for decision – whether breach of rules of natural justice – whether failure to distinguish between custody and parole in determining reduction of sentence – whether immigration status of applicant a relevant consideration – whether precedents in respect of discount of sentence were properly considered by Minister
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5(1), 7 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 19AP Customs Act 1901 (Cth) s 233B(1)(aa)
Cases cited: Attorney-General of the Commonwealth v Foster (1999) 84 FCR 582 Cornwell v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia (1993) 45 FCR 492 Duxerty v Minister for Justice and Customs (2002) FCA 1518 Martens v Commonwealth (2009) 174 CLR 114 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 R v Gladkowski (2000) QCA 352 R v Jackson [2003] QCA 31 Zoeller v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth (1987) 16 FCR 153
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate