Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Seller v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2011] FCA 865 Citation: Seller v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2011] FCA 865
Parties: ROSS EDWARD SELLER v DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File number: NSD 716 of 2011
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 3 August 2011
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – application to have bankruptcy notice set aside – abuse of process – application for extension of time for compliance – no power to extend time – no question of discretion arising PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – need to ensure contents of affidavit factually correct – failure to take steps to ensure facts correct
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 40(1)(g), 41, 45(1), 306 Bankruptcy Regulations reg 4.02(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 32, 33, 45(1) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 177 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) ss 14ZZM, 14ZZR
Cases cited: American Express International Inc v Held [1999] FCA 321, 87 FCR 583, cited Baker, Re; Ex parte Baker v Staples (Unreported, Federal Court of Australia, Kiefel J, 4 September 1995), cited Bayne v Baillieu; Bayne v Riggall (1908) 6 CLR 382, cited Bendigo Bank v Williams [2000] FCA 482, 98 FCR 377, cited Briggs, Re; Ex parte Briggs v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (WA) (1986) 12 FCR 310, referred to Brunninghausen v Glavanics [1998] FCA 230, cited Byron v Southern Star Group Pty Ltd (1997) 73 FCR 264, referred to Cavoli v Etl [2007] FCA 1191, cited Clyne v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (NSW) (No 3) (1982) 82 ATC 4484, considered Clyne v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (NSW) (No 4) (1982) 66 FLR 301, considered Clyne v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (NSW) (1982) 69 FLR 1, considered Clyne v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (NSW) (No 4) (1982) 43 ALR 342, considered Clyne v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (NSW) (1983) 48 ALR 545, cited Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Horvath [1999] FCA 143, cited Conway v Jackson [2001] FCA 230, 107 FCR 201, considered Coshott v Barry [2009] FCA 1521, 113 ALD 358, referred to Cummings v Claremont Petroleum NL (1996) 185 CLR 124, cited Cywinski v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [1990] VR 193, cited Dalco, Re; Ex parte Dalco v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1986) 67 ALR 605, referred to Davidova v Murphy [2009] FCA 601, cited Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Richard Walter Pty Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 168, cited F J Bloemen Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 147 CLR 263, cited Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Mackey (1982) 64 FLR 432, cited Geard, Re; Ex parte Reid (Unreported, Federal Court of Australia, Sheppard J, 11 February 1994), cited James v Abrahams (1981) 51 FLR 16, cited Killoran v Duncan [1999] FCA 1574, considered Kleinwort Benson Australia Limited v Crowl (1988) 165 CLR 71, cited Lentini, Re; Ex parte Lentini v CSR Limited (1991) 29 FCR 363, referred to Maxwell-Smith v S & E Hall Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 825, 233 ALR 81, cited McCallum v Commissioner of Taxation (1997) 75 FCR 458, cited O'Loughlin v Glenmont Investments Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 925, 191 ALR 336, cited Rankine v Lord [2011] FCA 478, 121 ALD 258, considered Rixon v Bryett [2001] FCA 963, 112 FCR 295, cited Scerri, Re (1998) 82 FCR 146, cited Shephard v Chiquita Brands (South Pacific) Ltd [2004] FCAFC 76, referred to Slack v Bottoms English Solicitors [2002] FCA 1445, cited Snow v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1987) 14 FCR 119, referred to Sterling, Re; Ex Parte Esanda (1980) 44 FLR 125, referred to Taylor, Re; Ex parte Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1983) 74 FLR 377, cited Watts v Adelaide Bank Ltd [2009] FCA 420, referred to Emmett, Justice A, 'Practical Litigation in the Federal Court of Australia: Affidavits' (2001) 20 Australian Bar Review 28 Gumley, W. and Wyatt, K, 'Are the Commissioner's Debt Recovery Powers Excessive?' (1996) 25 Australian Tax Review 186
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate