Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
iSOFT Group Limited, in the matter of iSOFT Group Limited (No 2) [2011] FCA 882 Citation: iSOFT Group Limited, in the matter of iSOFT Group Limited (No 2) [2011] FCA 882
Parties: ISOFT GROUP LIMITED
File number: NSD 657 of 2011
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 7 July 2011
Date of hearing: 7 July 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 5
Counsel for the plaintiff: M Oakes SC
Solicitor for the plaintiff: Baker & McKenzie
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 657 of 2011
IN THE MATTER OF ISOFT GROUP LIMITED ISOFT GROUP LIMITED
JUDGE: EMMETT J DATE OF ORDER: 7 JULY 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. A document substantially in the form of the document at Tab 6 of exhibit SMG-4 to the affidavit of Steven Mitchel Glanz sworn on 7 July 2011 (the Supplementary ES) be approved for distribution to iSOFT option holders. 2. By no later than 10 July 2011, the Supplementary ES be sent to each of the iSOFT option holders: 2.1 by prepaid ordinary post (airmail, if outside Australia) to the address in the option holder register; 2.2 by fax, where iSOFT has a fax number for the option holder; and 2.3 by email, where iSOFT has an email address for the option holder; and 2.4 by hand delivery, where the option holder is a current iSOFT employee who is not on leave. 3. The time by which proxy forms in respect of the Options Scheme of Arrangement (as that term is defined in the orders of the Court dated 9 June 2011) must be returned be extended to 11am on Thursday, 14 July 2011. 4. The proceeding remain stood over to 2.15pm on Monday, 18 July 2011 before Emmett J for the hearing of any application to approve the schemes of arrangement the subject of this proceeding. 5. There be liberty to restore on two days' notice. 6. These orders be entered forthwith. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate