Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2011] FCA 889 Citation: Singh v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2011] FCA 889
Appeal from: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Singh [2010] FMCA 849
Parties: PREM JEET KAUR SINGH v DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File number: NSD 1604 of 2010
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 8 August 2011
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – appeal from decision of Federal Magistrate – sequestration order made against estate of appellant – whether Federal Magistrate should have dismissed creditor's petition for "other sufficient cause" within meaning of s 52(2)(b) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – whether all documentation had been served on appellant by petitioning creditor – whether Federal Magistrate erred in failing to take into consideration damages claim of appellant in State Courts – whether claim in State Courts was likely to succeed – whether procedural fairness – whether hearing of appeal should be adjourned pending determination of other proceedings filed in the Federal Court – whether Federal Magistrate was justified in concluding that appellant was insolvent – whether Federal Magistrate erred in refusing to adjourn proceedings before his Honour
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 52
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; (2009) 258 ALR 14 cited Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Singh [2010] FMCA 849 cited Goldberg v Morrow [2004] FCA 1490 cited ICM Agriculture Pty Ltd v Young (2009) 260 ALR 515 cited Jordan v Smart [1961] NSWR 735 cited Singh v Ginelle Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 310 cited Singh v Super City Home Loans Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 646 cited Thornberry v R (1995) 69 ALJR 777 cited Totev v Sfar (2009) 260 ALR 515; [2008] FCAFC 35 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate