Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
De Brett Seafood Pty Ltd v Qantas Airways Limited (No 2) [2011] FCA 894 Citation: De Brett Seafood Pty Ltd v Qantas Airways Limited (No 2) [2011] FCA 894
Parties: DE BRETT SEAFOOD PTY LTD v QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED (ACN 009 661 901), DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (ARBN 495232), SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD (ARBN 1056195), SINGAPORE AIRLINES CARGO PTY LTD (ARBN 95934857), CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LIMITED (ARBN 479514), AIR NEW ZEALAND LT (ARBN 000 312 685), AIR NEW ZEALAND (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD (ACN 084 974 569), JAPAN AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL CO LIMITED (ARBN 564358) and BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC (ARBN 2747597)
File number: VID 12 of 2007
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 8 August 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – substitution application – mistake made in the name of the relevant party – substitution would not unreasonably prejudice party
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Part 5B Federal Court Rules O 6 r 11, O 11 r 1B, O 13 r 2, Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 45
Cases cited: Bridge Shipping Pty Ltd v Grand Shipping SA (1991) 173 CLR 231 followed Evans Constructions Co. Limited v Charrington and Co Limited [1983] QB 810 cited Lloyd Steel (Aust) Pty Ltd v Jade Shipping SA (1985) 1 NSWLR 212 cited
Date of hearing: 10 June 2011
Date of last submissions: 10 June 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate