Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi Energia S.R.L. [2011] FCA 938 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi Energia S.R.L. [2011] FCA 938
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v PRYSMIAN CAVI E SISTEMI ENERGIA S.R.L. (FORMERLY PIRELLI CAVI E SISTEMI ENERGIA S.P.A.), NEXANS SA RCS PARIS 393 525 852 and VISCAS CORPORATION ARBN 133 203 595
File number: SAD 145 of 2009
Judge: LANDER J
Date of judgment: 22 August 2011
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – documents – privilege – public interest immunity – balancing exercise – objection to disclosure as documents would reveal identity of cartel informer – whether immunity arises – whether documents relevant to application for leave to set aside service – whether immunity lost by possible disclosure in another jurisdiction EVIDENCE – documents – s 50 Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth) – whether order necessary to prevent prejudice to proper administration of justice PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Notices to Produce – whether Notices have a legitimate purpose – whether Notices oppressive – whether grounds to excuse compliance
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 75 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 17(1), s 17(4), s 50 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 2, s 157B Federal Court Rules, O 8 r 2, O 8 r 3, O 9 r 7, O 46 r 6 Federal Court Rules 2011, r 20.03
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate