Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kara v Comcare [2011] FCA 951 Citation: Kara v Comcare [2011] FCA 951
Appeal from: Kara v Comcare [2010] AATA 1031
Parties: NEAL KARA v COMCARE
File number: SAD 17 of 2011
Judge: LANDER J
Date of judgment: 23 August 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Notice of Appeal – application to strike out – s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – whether Notice of Appeal discloses an error of law – whether Notice of Appeal should be struck out
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 39(1), s 44(1), s 44(2A) Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), s 5 Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth), s 5A, s 5B, s 24(7)
Cases cited: Attorney-General for The State of New South Wales v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1 cited Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 cited Australian Postal Corporation v Burch (1998) 85 FCR 264 cited Australian Telecommunications Corp v Lambroglou (1990) 12 AAR 515 cited Birdseye v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2003) 38 AAR 55 cited Comcare v Etheridge (2006) 149 FCR 522 cited Repatriation Commission v Hayes (1982) 64 FLR 423 cited TNT Skypak International (Australia) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 82 ALR 175 cited Waterford v The Commonwealth of Australia (1987) 163 CLR 54 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate