Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Executor Trustees Limited v Propell National Valuers (WA) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 966 Citation: Australian Executor Trustees Limited v Propell National Valuers (WA) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 966
Parties: AUSTRALIAN EXECUTOR TRUSTEES LIMITED (ACN 007 869 794) and SEIZA MORTGAGE COMPANY PTY LTD (ACN 114 436 412) v PROPELL NATIONAL VALUERS (WA) PTY LTD (ACN 009 455 056) and TRAVIS COLEMAN
File number: NSD 974 of 2010
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 22 August 2011
Catchwords: COSTS - indemnity costs - principles applicable to award of indemnity costs - factors relevant to exercise of Court's discretion - whether rejection of offer to compromise by respondents unreasonable in the circumstances
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43
Cases cited: Alpine Hardwood (Aust) Pty Ltd v Hardys Pty Ltd (No 2) [2002] FCA 224; (2002) 190 ALR 121 Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Amcor Printing Papers Group Ltd [2000] FCA 163 Australian Executor Trustees Limited v Propell National Valuers (WA) Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 522 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 536; (1993) 46 FCR 225 Flemington Properties Pty Ltd v Raine & Horne Commercial Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 53 Hazeldene's Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian Workcover Authority (No 2) [2005] VSCA 298 Re Wilcox; Ex parte Venture Industries Pty Ltd (No 2) (1996) 72 FCR 151 Seven Network Limited v News Limited [2007] FCA 1489; (2007) 244 ALR 374
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate