Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mordechai v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 986 Citation: Mordechai v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 986
Appeal from: Mostafa and Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] AATA 49
Parties: MOSHE YAIR MORDECHAI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 230 of 2011
Judge: BENNETT J
Date of judgment: 30 August 2011
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Tribunal upheld decision of first respondent to refuse to grant spouse visa to applicant – whether error of law in application of ss 500(6H) and (6J) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether error of law in failure to consider applicant's separate protection visa application MIGRATION – application of ss 500(6H) and (6J) of Migration Act – whether unsigned document is a "written statement" – meaning of "at least 2 business days before the Tribunal holds a hearing" – whether Tribunal or first respondent can waive compliance with ss 500(6H) and (6J) of Migration Act
Words & phrases: "at least 2 business days before", "written statement"
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 36(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 500(6H), 500(6J), 501
Cases cited: Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v FFE Building Services Ltd (2003) ATPR 41-967 distinguished Forster v Jododex Aust Pty Ltd (1972) 127 CLR 421 followed Goldie v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2001) 111 FCR 378 applied Inspector-General in Bankruptcy v Bradshaw [2006] FCA 22 cited Milne v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2010) 52 AAR 1 applied Murray v Figge (1974) 4 ALR 612 distinguished
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate