Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Armit v Jeminex Limited [2011] FCA 990 Citation: Armit v Jeminex Limited [2011] FCA 990
Parties: MADONNA ANNE ARMIT v JEMINEX LIMITED
File number: NSD 1744 of 2010
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 22 August 2011
Corrigendum: 30 August 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Discovery – proceedings under Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and for negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract and under the Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) – parties' categories of discovery disputed – claim that categories too broad – claim for legal professional privilege – various categories accepted, amended and rejected as insufficiently related to the issues between the parties on the pleadings
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Cases cited: Austral Dutch Kaolin Pty Ltd v Hanjin P&C Co Ltd [2011] FCA 638 distinguished
Date of hearing: 22 August 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 65
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr G Adelstein of Diamond Conway Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms N Bearup
Solicitor for the Respondent: Sachs Gerace Lawyers
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Armit v Jeminex Limited [2011] FCA 990
CORRIGENDUM
1. In paragraph 64 of the Reasons for Judgment, in the last sentence at line 5, the word "be" should be omitted. 2. In paragraph 65 of the Reasons for Judgment, in the first sentence at line 1, the word "the" should be inserted between "to" and "costs". I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Corrigendum to the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Robertson
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate