Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Postal Corporation v Stephens (No 2) [2011] FCA 992 Citation: Australian Postal Corporation v Stephens (No 2) [2011] FCA 992
Parties: AUSTRALIAN POSTAL CORPORATION v LARRY STEPHENS
File number: NSD 1248 of 2011
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 19 August 2011
Legislation: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 4AA(1) Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 340(1), 351(1), 361(1), 539(2) s 546(2)(b), 570(1), 570(2)(a), 570(2)(b) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Postal Corporation v Stephens [2011] FCA 947 referred to Barclay v Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education (2011) 191 FCR 212 applied Bienstein v Bienstein (2003) 195 ALR 225 applied Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Australian Competition Consumer Commission (2007) 162 FCR 466 referred to Stephens v Australian Postal Corporation [2011] FMCA 448 referred to
Date of hearing: 19 August 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: FAIR WORK DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 19
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr S R Meehan
Solicitor for the Applicant: Blake Dawson
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms J Keys
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY FAIR WORK DIVISION NSD 1248 of 2011
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN POSTAL CORPORATION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate