Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Sensaslim Australia Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) (No 1) [2011] FCA 1012 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Sensaslim Australia Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) (No 1) [2011] FCA 1012
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v SENSASLIM AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 140 333 133, PETER CLARENCE FOSTER, PETER LESLIE O'BRIEN, ADAM TROY ADAMS and MICHAEL ANTHONY BOYLE
File number(s): NSD 1163 of 2011
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 31 August 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether an interim injunction should be continued – consideration of the extended or extra-territorial reach of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) and the Australian Consumer Law – preferred form of injunction noted
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law ss 232, 234 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) ss 5(1)(c), 6(2)(a), 6(2)(h), 6(3)
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Chen (2003) 132 FCR 309 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Hughes (2002) ATPR ¶41-863 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v World Play Services Pty Ltd (2004) 210 ALR 562 Wells v John R Lewis (International) Pty Ltd (1975) 25 FLR 194 World Play Services Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2005) 143 FCR 345
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate