Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Sensaslim Australia Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) (No 2) [2011] FCA 1013 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Sensaslim Australia Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) (No 2) [2011] FCA 1013
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v SENSASLIM AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 140 333 133, PETER CLARENCE FOSTER, PETER LESLIE O'BRIEN, ADAM TROY ADAMS and MICHAEL ANTHONY BOYLE
File number(s): NSD 1163 of 2011
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 31 August 2011
Catchwords: COURTS AND JUDGES – application for disqualification for reasonable apprehension of bias – whether reasonable apprehension of bias in the form of pre-judgment by making an order ex parte for service involving a particular email address
Cases cited: Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488 Reece v Webber (2011) 192 FCR 254
Date of hearing: 17 August 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 26
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr S White SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr J Young
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Fisher Dore Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1163 of 2011
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate