Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sunland Waterfront (BVI) Ltd v Prudentia Investments Pty Ltd (No 10) [2011] FCA 1032 Citation: Sunland Waterfront (BVI) Ltd v Prudentia Investments Pty Ltd (No 10) [2011] 1032
Parties: SUNLAND WATERFRONT (BVI) LTD and SUNLAND GROUP PTY LTD ACN 063 429 532 v PRUDENTIA INVESTMENTS PTY LTD ACN 091 390 742, HANLEY INVESTMENTS PTE LTD, ANGUS JOHN LUXMOORE REED and MATTHEW JAMES JOYCE
File number: QUD 195 of 2009
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 24 August 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – trial procedure – whether to hear the evidence of fourth respo ndent separately and before the evidence in chief of the applicants and other respondents – where fourth respondent imminently facing possible criminal conviction and incarceration – where allegations against fourth respondent are tantamount to fraud – where not procedurally fair to hear fourth respondent's evidence separately – application refused
Cases cited: Joyce v Sunland Waterfront (BVI) Ltd [2011] FCAFC 95 cited
Date of hearing: 24 August 2011
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr P O'Shea SC with Mr SS Monks
Solicitor for the Applicants: Thomsons Lawyers
Counsel for the First, Second and Third Respondents: Mr SG Finch SC with Mr H Carmichael
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate