Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QS Holdings Sarl v Paul's Retail Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 1038 Citation: QS Holdings Sarl v Paul's Retail Pty Ltd [2011] (No 2) FCA 1038
Parties: QS HOLDINGS SARL, GSM (TRADEMARKS) PTY LTD ACN 085 955 291, GSM (OPERATIONS) PTY LTD ACN 085 950 803, DC SHOES INC, UG MANUFACTURING CO PTY LTD ACN 005 047 941, PINEAPPLE TRADEMARKS PTY LTD ACN 107 248 680 and QUIKSILVER INC v PAUL'S RETAIL PTY LTD ACN 114 419 242 and PAUL ANDREW DWYER
File number: VID 652 of 2010
Judge: KENNY J
Date of judgment: 5 September 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appropriate form of order to give effect to the findings in [2011] FCA 853 – findings of trade mark and copyright infringement made – declarations made – injunctions – nature of discretionary power and relevant circumstances – appropriate form and scope of injunctions. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – damages or account of profits – further adjudication of matters under s 115(3) of the Copyright Act 1968 – orders for delivery up of infringing goods. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – costs – whether costs should be payable forthwith – Rule 40.13 Federal Court Rules – factors relevant to the exercise of the discretion – no occasion to depart from usual rule in these circumstances.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cambur Industries Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1027 Nokia Corporation v Truong (2005) 66 IPR 511 Sporte Leisure Pty Ltd v Paul's International Pty Ltd (No 3) (2010) 88 IPR 242 Coflexip SA v Stolt Comex Seaway MS Ltd [2001] RPC 9 Welcome Real-Time SA v Catuity Inc (No 2) (2001) AIPC 91,736 Solahart Industries Pty Ltd v Solar Shop Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 780 Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Sharman Networks Ltd (2006) 150 FCR 110 ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1992) 38 FCR 248 Microsoft Corp v Plato Technologies Ltd [1999] FSR 834 Microsoft Corp v Goodview Electronics Pty Ltd (2000) 49 IPR 578 QS Holdings Sarl v Paul's Retail Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 853 Nokia Corporation v Liu (2009) 82 IPR 452 Courtney v Medtel Pty Ltd (No 3) [2004] FCA 347 McKellar v Container Terminal Management Services Ltd [1999] FCA 1639 Life Airbag Company of Australia Pty Ltd v Life Airbag Company (New Zealand) Ltd [1998] FCA 545 Wu v Avin Operations Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] FCA 792 Thunderdome Racetiming and Scoring Pty Ltd v Dorian Industries Pty Ltd (1992) 36 FCR 297 Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity Doctrines and Remedies (Butterworths, 4th ed, 2002) Date of hearing: 12 August 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate