Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (No 3) [2011] FCA 1042 Citation: Singh v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (No 3) [2011] FCA 1042
Parties: MOHINDER SINGH v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILIES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND WORKPLACE RELATIONS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILIES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND WORKPLACE RELATIONS v MOHINDER SINGH MOHINDER SINGH v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, EMPLOYMENT AND WORKPLACE RELATIONS
File number(s): VID 234 of 2010 VID 265 of 2010 VID 1106 of 2010
Judges: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 31 August 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – vexatious litigant sanction – whether any extant proceedings should be allowed to continue without the leave of the Court
Legislation: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1977 (Cth) Federal Court Rules (as in operation immediately prior to 1 August 2011), O 21 r 1 Federal Court Rules 2011, r 1.04(2)(3)
Cases cited: Singh v Secretary Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2011] FCA 116 Singh v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (2008) FCA 1463 Singh v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations [2009] FCAFC 59 Singh v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations [2009] HCASL 194 Singh v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2011] FCA 833
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate