Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
B v Australian Crime Commission [2011] FCA 1046 Citation: B v Australian Crime Commission [2011] FCA 1046
Parties: B v AUSTRALIAN CRIME COMMISSION and Jeffrey Philip Anderson
File number: SAD 14 of 2011
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 8 September 2011
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — application under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1901 (Cth) and ss 5 and 6 of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) for declarations and injunctions in relation to decisions and conduct of the Australian Crime Commission ('Commission') and its examiner under the Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) ('the Commonwealth Act') and Australian Crime Commission (South Australia) Act 2004 ('the State Act') — where Board of Commission had made instrument pursuant to s 55A(3) of Commonwealth Act authorising special investigation into criminal activity under State Act — where applicant summoned to be examined and to produce documents pursuant to the determination — where determination referred to 'clause 4' but the determination contained no clause 4 — whether therefore determination did not satisfactorily describe investigation as required by s 8(4)(a) of the State Act — consideration of uncertainty as ground for judicial review — where examiner not listed in determination in classes of person to participate in the investigation — whether the examiner had authority to issue the summons given requirement of s 8(1)(b) of the State Act — where criminal proceedings pending against applicant in State court Held: The application was dismissed.
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5, 6 Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) ss 4, 55A Australian Crime Commission (South Australia) Act 2004 (SA) ss 3, 8, 19, 21 Judiciary Act 1901 (Cth) s 39B Australian Crime Commission — State Special Investigation Consent and Determination (High Risk Crime Groups — South Australia) 2009
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate