Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
McHugh v Australian Jockey Club Limited (No 3) [2011] FCA 1053 Citation: McHugh v Australian Jockey Club Limited (No 3) [2011] FCA 1053
Parties: BRUCE MCHUGH v AUSTRALIAN JOCKEY CLUB LIMITED, VICTORIA RACING CLUB LIMITED, AUSTRALIAN RACING BOARD LIMITED, RACING INFORMATION SERVICES AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED, THOROUGHBRED BREEDERS AUSTRALIA LIMITED and AUSTRALIAN TURF CLUB LIMITED
File number: NSD 1187 of 2009
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 12 September 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Privilege – application for inspection of documents over which claim for privilege was made – purpose of communications
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 119
Cases cited: Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49 cited Kennedy v Wallace (2004) 142 FCR 185 cited National Crime Authority v S (1991) 29 FCR 203 cited Trade Practices Commission v Sterling (1979) 36 FLR 244 cited
Date of hearing: 7 September 2011, 8 September 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr J Lazarus
Solicitor for the Applicant: Brock Partners
Counsel for the Third Respondent: Mr G Ng
Solicitor for the Third Respondent: Mr T Price of Yeldham Price O'Brien Lusk
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1187 of 2009
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate