Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Longa v Tim Haffner & Associates Pty Limited [2011] FCA 1060 Citation: Longa v Tim Haffner & Associates Pty Limited [2011] FCA 1060
Parties: GABRIEL IGNACIO LONGA v TIM HAFFNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LIMITED ACN 075 423 488, TIMOTHY JAMES HAFFNER and DIANNE HELENE HAFFNER
File number(s): NSD 1179 of 2011
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 12 September 2011
Date of hearing: 12 September 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 20
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M Heath
Solicitor for the Applicant: MWA Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr M Smith
Solicitor for the Respondents: Paton Hooke Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1179 of 2011
BETWEEN: GABRIEL IGNACIO LONGA
Applicant
AND: TIM HAFFNER & ASSOCIATES PTY LIMITED ACN 075 423 488
First Respondent
TIMOTHY JAMES HAFFNER
Second Respondent
DIANNE HELENE HAFFNER
Third Respondent
JUDGE: YATES J DATE OF ORDER: 12 SEPTEMBER 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT: 1. ORDERS that subject to the notation in 2 below, the First, Second and Third Respondents ("the Respondents") give discovery to the Applicant of the Applicant's categories of documents for discovery annexed to the interlocutory application filed 1 September 2011 and marked "A", save for category 16, within 14 days; 2. NOTES that in respect of the Applicant's discovery categories 15(iii), (vi), (x) and (xi), the Respondents need only provide discovery of those sub-categories within 14 days of the Applicant's solicitor informing the Respondents of which documents contemplated by those sub-categories are required by the Applicant's expert; 3. NOTES that documents discovered by the Respondents in this proceeding also be made available to the Applicant in proceeding No. NSD 1178 of 2011 (James Tyrpenou v Tim Haffner & Associates Pty Ltd and others), which proceeding is travelling together with this proceeding; 4. ORDERS that the costs of and incidental to the hearing of the interlocutory application filed 1 September 2011 be costs in the cause. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate