Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Coca-Cola Company v Pepsico Inc [2011] FCA 1069 Citation: Coca-Cola Company v Pepsico Inc [2011] FCA 1069
Parties: THE COCA-COLA COMPANY v PEPSICO INC, PEPSICO AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED (ACN 079 719 743) and SCHWEPPES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 004 243 994)
File number: VID 876 of 2010
Judge: DODDS-STREETON J
Date of judgment: 15 September 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Discovery – Proceeding for trade mark infringement, misleading or deceptive conduct and passing off – Disputed category of discovery relating to indemnities requested by or provided to third respondent – Whether documents within disputed category should have temporal cut-off point – Breadth of formulation of disputed category
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 rr 20.11 and 20.14
Cases cited: Australian Woollen Mills Ltd v FS Walton & Co Ltd (1937) 58 CLR 641 considered World Import & Export Co Ltd & Anor v Shuey Shing Pty Ltd & Ors (1989) 17 IPR 289 cited United Salvage Pty Ltd v Louis Dreyfus Amateurs SNC [2006] FCA 116 cited
Date of hearing: 15 September 2011
Date of last submissions: 15 September 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 40
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P Wallis
Solicitor for the Applicant: Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
Solicitor for the Respondents: Mr P Kerr of Allens Arthur Robinson
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 876 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate