Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kamely v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2011] FCA 1071 Citation: Kamely v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2011] FCA 1071
Appeal from: Kamely v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2010] FMCA 867
Parties: KAMELY v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1643 of 2010
Judge: STONE J
Date of judgment: 20 September 2011
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether claim to 'proper, genuine and realistic consideration' is covert application for merits review MIGRATION – Condition 8105 – appeal – student visa subclass 572 cancelled due to breach of Condition 8105 – condition prohibited working more than 20 hours a week – claim that excess hours were industry placement rejected – meaning of "work" – whether Tribunal complied with statutory obligations – where Condition 8105 breached visa cancellation mandatory under s 116(3) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) and reg 2.43 of Migration Regulations 1994 – Tribunal has no discretion Words & phrases: "work" and "proper, genuine and realistic consideration" Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 116(1)(b) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Schedules 2 and 8, subclause 576.11, reg 2.43(2)(b)(i)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate