Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hanna v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2011] FCA 1077 Citation: Hanna v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2011] FCA 1077
Parties: GEORGE KHALIL HANNA v AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION and STANISLAUS SEBASTIAN, MAUREEN SEBASTIAN, LIM KHOON LENG and JENNY LEOW
File number: WAD 360 of 2011
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 20 September 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether matter should be referred to mediation – two related proceedings – powers and discretion of the Court – lack of consent to attend mediation – whether any benefit to early mediation
Legislation: Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 r 2.2
Cases cited: Sebastian v Strongwall International Limited (Deregistered) [2011] FCA 1045
Date of hearing: 12 September 2011
Date of last submissions: 15 September 2011
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 18
Counsel for the Plaintiff: GJ Douglas
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Hotckin Hanly Lawyers
Counsel for the Defendant: The Defendant did not appear
Counsel for the Interveners: G Clarke SC
Solicitor for the Interveners: Feinauer Commercial Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 360 of 2011
BETWEEN: GEORGE KHALIL HANNA
Plaintiff
AND: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION
Defendant
AND: STANISLAUS SEBASTIAN
MAUREEN SEBASTIAN
LIM KHOON LENG
JENNY LEOW
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate