Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Schutz DSL (Australia) Pty Ltd v VIP Plastic Packaging Pty Ltd (No 9) [2011] FCA 1087 Citation: Schutz DSL (Australia) Pty Ltd v VIP Plastic Packaging Pty Ltd (No 9) [2011] FCA 1087
Parties: SCHUTZ DSL (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD (ACN 009 069 907), SCHUTZ GMBH & CO KGAA and PROTECHNA S.A. v VIP PLASTIC PACKAGING PTY LTD (ACN 095 313 705) and VIP STEEL PACKAGING PTY LTD (ACN 095 314 195)
File number: WAD 136 of 2009
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 21 September 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to amend pleadings – application to withdraw an admission – whether amendment constitutes a withdrawal of an admission – whether the amendments will affect the factual scope of the proceedings – whether amendment will cause prejudice
Legislation: Patents Act 1990 (Cth) s 144 Federal Court Rules O 18 r 1(2)
Cases cited: AMI Australia Holdings Pty Ltd v Bade Medical Institute (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 2) (2009) 262 ALR 458 Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 Celestino, R. v. Celestino, A [1990] FCA 449 Murran Investments Pty Ltd v Aromatic Beauty Products Pty Ltd (2000) 191 ALR 579 Schutz DSL (Australia) Pty Ltd (ACN 009 069 907) v VIP Plastic Packaging Pty Ltd (ACN 095 313 705) (2009) IPR 477 Smith v Cropper (t/a HS Cropper & Co) (1884) LR 26 Ch D 700
Date of hearing: 20 June 2011
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate