Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Speedo Holdings B.V. v Evans [2011] FCA 1089 Citation: Speedo Holdings B.V. v Evans [2011] FCA 1089
Parties: SPEEDO HOLDINGS B.V. AND ANOR v DAVE EVANS
File number: NSD 1442 of 2011
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 21 September 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for an order for deemed service of documents – application for substituted service
Legislation: Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011, rr 10.23, 10.24 Federal Court Rules, O 7 rr 9, 10
Cases cited: Astellas Pharma Inc v Kissei Pharmaceutical Co Ltd [2010] FCA 335, cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v D M Faulkner Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 1666, cited Beluga Shipping GMBH & Co v Headway Shipping Ltd (No 3) [2008] FCA 1989, cited Commonwealth Bank of Australia v King [2011] FCA 790, cited EMI Songs Australia Pty Ltd v Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd [2010] FCAFC 110, 87 IPR 461, cited GSM (Trademarks) Pty Ltd v Shao [2006] FCA 1272, cited Statewide Secured Investments Pty Ltd v Tarrant [2011] FCA 1067, referred to
Date of hearing: 21 September 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr M J Darke
Solicitor for the Applicants: Ms O Gourley (Corrs Chambers Westgarth)
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent did not appear
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate