Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Schutz DSL (Australia) Pty Ltd v VIP Plastic Packaging Pty Ltd (No 11) [2011] FCA 1108 Citation: Schutz DSL (Australia) Pty Ltd v VIP Plastic Packaging Pty Ltd (No 11) [2011] FCA 1108
Parties: SCHUTZ DSL (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD (ACN 009 069 907), SCHUTZ GMBH & CO KGAA and PROTECHNA S.A. v VIP PLASTIC PACKAGING PTY LTD (ACN 095 313 705) and VIP STEEL PACKAGING PTY LTD (ACN 095 314 195)
File number: WAD 136 of 2009
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 28 September 2011
Catchwords: TRADE PRACTICES – alternative relief – alternative to injunctive relief – labelling PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – relief previously sought – where circumstances have changed – whether there is new evidence to support the relief sought – whether relief sought is excessive – whether burden is excessive
Cases cited: Schutz DSL (Australia) Pty Ltd v VIP Plastic Packaging Pty Ltd (No 5) [2010] FCA 1105 Schutz DSL (Australia) Pty Ltd v VIP Plastic Packaging Pty Ltd (No 9) [2011] FCA 1087 Schutz DSL (Australia) Pty Ltd v VIP Plastic Packaging Pty Ltd (No 10) [2011] FCA 1107
Date of hearing: 20 June 2011
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicants: ML Bennett with EJ Heerey
Solicitor for the Applicants: Bennett + Co
Counsel for the Respondents: SCG Burley SC with AR Lang
Solicitor for the Respondents: Gilbert + Tobin
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 136 of 2009
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate