Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Zippo Manufacturing Co v Jaxlawn Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1125 Citation: Zippo Manufacturing Co v Jaxlawn Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1125
Parties: ZIPPO MANUFACTURING CO v JAXLAWN PTY LTD (ACN 010 757 123)
File number: VID 601 of 2010
Judge: GORDON J
Date of judgment: 29 September 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for summary judgment – trade mark infringement – breach of deed of settlement – reinstatement of proceeding
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)
Cases cited: Bodum v DKSH Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 98 Chanel Limited v Donoghue [2008] FCA 1643 Nokia Corporation v Liu (2009) 179 FCR 422 Playboy Enterprises International Inc. v You Tao Hong (2004) 63 IPR 533 Sharbutt v Supatech Holdings Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 957 QS Holdings Sarl v Paul's Retail Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 853 QS Holdings Sarl v Paul's Retail Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 1038
Date of hearing: 29 September 2011
Date of last submissions: 29 September 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 31
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr IP Horak
Solicitor for the Applicant: Watermark Intellectual Property Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 601 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate