Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
McHugh v Australian Jockey Club Limited (No 7) [2011] FCA 1136 Citation: McHugh v Australian Jockey Club Limited (No 7) [2011] FCA 1136
Parties: BRUCE MCHUGH v AUSTRALIAN JOCKEY CLUB LIMITED, VICTORIA RACING CLUB LIMITED, AUSTRALIAN RACING BOARD LIMITED, THOROUGHBRED BREEDERS AUSTRALIA LIMITED and AUSTRALIAN TURF CLUB LIMITED
File number(s): NSD 1187 of 2009
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 30 September 2011
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 135(c)
Date of hearing: 30 September 2011
Place: Sydney
Division GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 7
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr A Tonking SC with Mr J Lazarus with Ms P Arcus
Solicitor for the Applicant: Brock Partners
Counsel for the First, Second and Sixth Respondents: Mr AJ Bannon SC with Dr R Higgins
Counsel for the First, Second and Sixth Respondents: Johnson Winter & Slattery
Counsel for the Third Respondent: Mr GES Ng
Solicitor for the Third Respondent: Yeldham Price O'Brien Lusk
Counsel for the Fifth Respondent: Mr JS Emmett
Solicitor for the Fifth Respondent: Esplins Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1187 of 2009
BETWEEN: BRUCE MCHUGH
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate