Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Seidler v University of New South Wales [2011] FCA 1156 Citation: Seidler v University of New South Wales [2011] FCA 1156
Parties: KATHRYN SEIDLER v THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES 'UNSW', THE AUSTRALIAN GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT 'AGSM', VICE-CHANCELLOR FRED HILMER , DEPUTY VICE-CHANCELLOR RICHARD HENRY (NOW PROFESSOR RICHARD HENRY), PROFESSOR IAN WILKINSON, PROFESSOR PAUL PATTERSON, PROFESSOR PAM MORRISON and PROFESSOR JOHN ROBERTS KATHRYN SEIDLER v THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES 'UNSW', THE AUSTRALIAN GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT 'AGSM', VICE-CHANCELLOR FRED HILMER , DEPUTY VICE-CHANCELLOR RICHARD HENRY (NOW PROFESSOR RICHARD HENRY), PROFESSOR IAN WILKINSON, PROFESSOR PAUL PATTERSON, PROFESSOR PAM MORRISON and PROFESSOR JOHN ROBERTS
File numbers: NSD 893 of 2011 NSD 1298 of 2011
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 6 October 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Leave to appeal – application for leave to appeal from summary judgment pursuant to s 31A(2) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A(2) Federal Court Rules 2011 r 6.03(1)
Cases cited: Seidler v University of New South Wales [2010] FMCA 887 cited Seidler v The University of New South Wales [2011] FCA 640 cited Seidler v University of New South Wales [2011] FCA 830 cited
Date of hearing: 5 October 2011
Place: Sydney
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate