Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Menzies v Paccar Financial Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1161 Citation: Menzies v Paccar Financial Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1161
Parties: IAN DAVID MENZIES and COLLEEN ANNE MENZIES v PACCAR FINANCIAL PTY LTD (ACN 005 592 049) IAN DAVID MENZIES and COLLEEN ANNE MENZIES v PACCAR FINANCIAL PTY LTD (ACN 005 592 049) & ORS
File numbers: VID 495 of 2010 VID 660 of 2010
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 21 October 2011
Catchwords: COSTS – indemnity costs orders sought – arising out of bankruptcy proceedings – stay of sequestration order – appeal from sequestration order allowed – contempt charges – motions for removal of trustees - brought for ulterior purpose
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 54, 179 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24, 37M, 37N, 43 Federal Court Rules 2010 (repealed) O 62 r 9, Div 1, pt 52 Revised Professional Practice and Conduct Rules 1995 (NSW) R 23A, pts 22, 23, 35, 36, 37
Cases cited: Advan Investments Pty Ltd v Dean Gleeson Motor Sales Pty Ltd [2003] VSC 201 cited, applied Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 cited Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Incorporated (1991) 33 FCR 397 cited De Sousa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1993) 41 FCR 544 cited Doolan v Dare [2004] FCA 682 compared Dowling v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCAFC 28 cited Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 considered, compared J-Corp Pty Ltd v The Australian Builders Labourers Federation Union of Workers (No 2) (1993) 46 IR 301 cited Lemoto v Able Technical Pty Ltd (2005) 63 NSWLR 300 cited, applied Levick v Commissioner of Taxation (2003) 102 FCR 155 cited, applied Menzies v Paccar Financial Ltd [2010] FCA 748 considered Menzies v Paccar Financial Ltd [2010] FCA 931 considered Menzies v Paccar Financial Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 460 referred to Re Alafaci; Registrar in Bankruptcy v Hardwick (1976) 9 ALR 262 cited Ridehalgh v Horsefield [1994] Ch 205 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate